🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.